IceRiver KS5M vs Antminer L11 Hyd 2U
Compare IceRiver KS5M and Antminer L11 Hyd 2U specifications, hashrate, power, efficiency, and hosting prices side by side
Detailed Specification Comparison
| Specification | IceRiver KS5M | Antminer L11 Hyd 2U |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IceRiver | Bitmain |
| Hashrate | 15 TH/S | 35 GH/S |
| Power | 3400W | 5775W |
| Efficiency | 226.67 J/Th | 165 J/Gh |
| Mineable Coin | KAS | DOGE+LTC |
| Algorithm | - | - |
| Daily Income | $2.60 | $12.78 |
| Starting Price | $700.000 | $16,624.310 |
| Hosting Providers | 1 | 1 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: IceRiver KS5M or Antminer L11 Hyd 2U?
It depends on your priorities. IceRiver KS5M offers 15 TH/S at 226.67 J/TH, while Antminer L11 Hyd 2U offers 35 GH/S at 165 J/TH. For higher hashrate choose Antminer L11 Hyd 2U; for better efficiency choose Antminer L11 Hyd 2U.
What's the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS5M and Antminer L11 Hyd 2U?
IceRiver KS5M has 226.67 J/TH efficiency while Antminer L11 Hyd 2U has 165 J/TH. Lower J/TH means less electricity consumed per unit of hashrate, resulting in lower long-term operating costs.
Where can I host these miners?
HostingASIC lists 1 hosting providers for IceRiver KS5M and 1 for Antminer L11 Hyd 2U. Compare electricity rates and hosting services across global locations.